《葉謝鄧》合伙人


  • 葉謝鄧律師行:分行多、律師眾、資歷厚、經驗豐、實力強
    高級合伙人:謝連忠律師。執業14年‧創辦葉謝鄧律師行‧曾接受各大媒體無數訪問、婚姻監禮人。
    疏忽傷亡索償管理合伙人:謝連豐律師。本行辦超過600宗傷亡索償,賠償總額億計。
    債務重組、破產案管理合伙人:孫楚雍律師。本行已辦理過千宗IVA、超過五千宗破產。
    樓宇買賣、贖樓、IVA、破產案合伙人:鄧達明律師。本行已辦理過千宗IVA、超過五千宗破產。

Hot Sites



Duplicating Teacher's Speech is No Offence


@eLaw Focus:14 July, 2003.
Author: Thomas Tse. Partner, Yip, Tse & Tang

elaw120x120A school-cert candidate was found having duplicated the sound recording of the teaching content of a tutor. Customs officers arrested him for investigation and no charge had yet laid. Declining cost and increasing convenience of the recording media make content duplication unprecentedly common among youngsters. MP3 and MPEG are the most popular formats for digital sound recording and video.

The arrested school-cert candidate would not have been so arrested if he had not placed the duplicated contents for sale on an auction site. Duplicating copyright works such as sound recording for self-use is not an offence. Distributing it or placing it for sale is definitely liable to criminal prosecution.

Speech not recorded on a media has no copyright. This is because copyright protection requires 'fixation'. Students are free to record but as a matter of coutesy should seek the teacher's permission. Students should however be careful. Although the speech itself has no copyright, the speech might contain contents which are copyrighted such as a lyric or an article. In any event, never put anything on sale or make further duplicates. Students should not place anything materials on the Internet for people to download or listen. This can cause trouble.

About @eLaw Focus:

@eLaw Focus is a news column on current electronic laws issues. It is provided by lawyers of Yip, Tse & Tang, a law firm specialising on eLaw practice. For further enquiry: info@elaw.com.hk

《香港電子法律》書介

星級法律網